Document Type
Article
Abstract
This essay interrogates the critical presuppositions of the genre of autotheory for reckoning with the aporia of social death central to the fields of Black studies. The burgeoning scholarship on autotheory has viewed its formal hybridity as indexing a radical intersubjectivity that exceeds the generic and ontological assumptions of the universal subject of theory and the self-possessive individualism of autobiography. However, we contend that autotheory’s perceived embodiment of a radical intersubjectivity is predicated on a universal capacity for kinship that elides its parasitic relation to the generational kinlessness of slavery and its afterlives. Whereas autotheory writ large makes recourse to an implicit or explicit humanism as an avenue for articulating a radical intersectional or coalitional politics, the examples of Black feminist autotheory considered in this essay reckon with the figure of the Black maternal as “both mother and mother-dispossessed,” which is to say Black kin/lessness. As theorized by Hortense J. Spillers, Saidiya V. Hartman, and Christina Sharpe, the Black maternal indexes the condition of natal alienation on both the micro scale of the family—partus sequitur ventrem—and the macro scale of the nation/ diaspora. If, as Spillers argues, the ungendered (captive) flesh comes before (liberated) body-capable-of-kin, then we argue that the Black maternal’s natal alienation introduces a caesura between auto- (self) and theory, leading us to (re)cast the work
Recommended Citation
Kaplan, Andrew S. and Pyon, Kevin
(2024)
"Auto/theory and the Black Maternal,"
Criticism: Vol. 66:
Iss.
2, Article 3.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol66/iss2/3