Document Type
Article
Abstract
This study explores how the lived experience of court-involved youth impacts learning and school culture, and solicits youth voice in creating a trauma-informed intervention to improve student educational well-being. Thirty-nine female students, ages 14 to 18, participated in focus groups to describe externalizing behaviors that they have both witnessed and personally struggled with in the classroom, discuss the perceived causes of these behaviors, and their suggestions for improving school culture to reduce these behavior manifestations in the classroom. Two major categories of behavior were identified, including: “anger emotions” and “aggressive actions.” Students described the causes of behavior as, “environmental influences” and “triggers.” The most common solutions that students gave to reduce externalizing behaviors in school settings included “encouraging respect of others” and “improving behavior management to enhance student engagement.” An additional solution suggested by the students included the “monarch room as support.” The Monarch Room is an alternative intervention to traditional suspension/expulsion polices that provides students in need of specific emotional support an opportunity to redirect/de-escalate externalizing behavior or mood in the school setting. This study highlights the need for trauma-informed approaches in school settings, and the importance of the inclusion of a youth voice in developing and implementing these intervention models.
Disciplines
Child Psychology | Curriculum and Instruction | Curriculum and Social Inquiry | Health Psychology | Social Work
Recommended Citation
West, S. D., Day, A. G., Somers, C. L., & Baroni, B. A. 2014. Student perspectives on how trauma experiences manifest in the classroom: engaging court-involved youth in the development of a trauma-informed teaching curriculum. Children and Youth Services Review, 38: 58-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.013.
Included in
Child Psychology Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Social Work Commons
Comments
NOTICE IN COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLISHER POLICY: This is the author’s final manuscript version, post-peer-review, of a work accepted for publication in Children and Youth Services Review. Changes resulting from the publishing process may not be reflected in this document; changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. This version has been formatted (and paginated) for archiving; a definitive version was subsequently published in Children and Youth Services Review, 38: 58-65 (March 2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.013