•  
  •  
 

Publication Date

1-1-2013

Abstract

The present paper discusses literature concerning the practice of bartering for counseling, psychological, or social work services in lieu of traditional monetary payment. The author contrasts the language concerning the practice of bartering found in the respective ethical codes for each profession, and presents literature describing both risks and potential benefits of bartering arrangements. The primary risks of bartering include liability concerns and the potential for harmful or exploitive dual relationships. The primary benefits are that bartering makes mental health services available to those who cannot afford traditional fees, and allows for a culturally relevant compensation method for those whose cultural backgrounds emphasize the practice of bartering.

Recommended Citation

Lane, J. A. (2013). The Ethical Implication of Bartering for Mental Health Services: Examining Interdisciplinary Ethical Standards, Michigan Journal of Counseling, 39(2), 4-12. doi:10.22237/mijoc/1356998460

DOI

10.22237/mijoc/1356998460

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.