Open Access Preprint
This article argues that the genetic engineering technology known as gene drive must be evaluated in context of the historic and ongoing impacts of settler colonialism and military experimentation on Indigenous lands and peoples. After defining gene drive and previewing some of the key ethical issues related to its use, it compares the language used to justify Cold War era nuclear testing in the Pacific with contemporary scholarship framing islands as ideal test sites for gene drive-modified organisms. In both cases, perceptions of islands as remote and isolated are mobilized to warrant their treatment as sites of experimentation for emerging technologies. Though gene drive may offer valuable interventions into issues affecting island communities (e.g., vector-borne disease and invasive species management), proposals to conduct the first open trials of gene drive on islands are complicit in a long history of injustice that has treated islands (and their residents) as dispensable to the risks and unintended consequences associated with experimentation. This article contends that ethical gene drive research cannot be achieved without the inclusion of Indigenous peoples as key stakeholders and provides three recommendations to guide community engagement involving Indigenous communities: centering Indigenous self-determination, ditching the deficit model of engagement, and integrating Indigenous knowledge and values in the research and decision-making processes related to gene drive.
Taitingfong, Riley I., "Islands as Laboratories: Indigenous Knowledge and Gene Drives in the Pacific" (2020). Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints. 156.