Do recent data from the Seychelles Islands alter the conclusions of the NRC Report on the toxicological effects of methylmercury?

Authors

Alan H. Stern, Bureau for Risk Analysis, Division of Science, Research, and Technology, New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionFollow
Joseph L. Jacobson, College of Science, Wayne State UniversityFollow
Louise Ryan, Harvard School of Public HealthFollow
Thomas A. Burke, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthFollow

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Abstract

In 2000, the National Research Council (NRC), an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, released a report entitled, "Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury." The overall conclusion of that report was that, at levels of exposure in some fish- and marine mammal-consuming communities (including those in the Faroe Islands and New Zealand), subtle but significant adverse effects on neuropsychological development were occurring as a result of in utero exposure. Since the release of that report, there has been continuing discussion of the public health relevance of current levels of exposure to Methylmercury. Much of this discussion has been linked to the release of the most recent longitudinal update of the Seychelles Island study. It has recently been posited that these findings supercede those of the NRC committee, and that based on the Seychelles findings, there is little or no risk of adverse neurodevelopmental effects at current levels of exposure. In this commentary, members of the NRC committee address the conclusions from the NRC report in light of the recent Seychelles data. We conclude that no evidence has emerged since the publication of the NRC report that alters the findings of that report.

Disciplines

Environmental Health | Environmental Public Health | Medical Toxicology | Toxicology

Recommended Citation

Stern et al. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 2004, 3:2
doi:10.1186/1476-069X-3-2