Comparing anatomical imaging with functional imaging for coronary artery disease: the limitations of vessel stenosis and the benefits of non-invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve

Authors

Zachary Zajac, Corewell Wayne Family Medicine Residency, Michigan, United StatesFollow
Laura Aravena, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, United StatesFollow
Madeline Simone, University of Illinois Chicago Family Medicine Residency, Illinois, United StatesFollow
David R. Allen lll, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, United StatesFollow
Pranally Desai, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, United StatesFollow
Chanel Harvey, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, United StatesFollow
Nolan Tews, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, United StatesFollow
Nickolas Vinokurov, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, United StatesFollow

Abstract

A clinical decision report appraising

Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, Pietila M, Teresinska A, Aguadé-Bruix S, et al. Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease by Noninvasive Anatomical and Functional Imaging. Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;8(3):e002179. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179

for a stable hospitalized patient admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) rule out.

DOI

10.22237/crp/1770638520

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) License

Recommended Citation

ZAJAC Z, ARAVENA L, SIMONE M, ALLEN DR III, DESAI P, HARVEY C, TEWS N, VINOKUROV N. Comparing anatomical imaging with functional imaging for coronary artery disease: the limitations of vessel stenosis and the benefits of non-invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve. Clin Res Prac. Feb 24 2026;12(1):eP3608. https://doi.org/10.22237/crp/1770638520