Access Type
Open Access Dissertation
Date of Award
January 2013
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Department
Mathematics
First Advisor
Zhimin Zhang
Second Advisor
Fatih Celiker
Abstract
We introduce and analyze discontinuous Galerkin methods
for a Naghdi type arch model. We prove that, when the numerical traces are properly chosen, the methods display optimal convergence uniformly with respect to the thickness of the arch. These methods are thus free from membrane and shear locking.
We also prove that, when polynomials of degree $k$ are used,
{\em all} the numerical traces superconverge with a rate of order
h 2k+1.
Based on the superconvergent phenomenon and we show how to
post-process them in an element-by-element fashion
to obtain a far better approximation. Indeed, we prove that,
if polynomials of degree k are used, the post-processed
approximation converges with order 2k+1 in the L2-norm throughout the domain. This has to be contrasted with the fact that before post-processing, the approximation converges with order k+1 only. Moreover, we show that this superconvergence property does not deteriorate as the thickness of the arch becomes extremely small.
Since the DG methods suffer from too many degree of freedoms we introduce and analyze a class of hybridizable
discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) methods for Naghdi arches.
The main feature of these methods is that they can be
implemented in an efficient way through a hybridization
procedure which reduces the globally coupled unknowns to
approximations to the transverse and tangential displacement
and bending moment at the element boundaries.
The error analysis of the methods is based on the use
of a projection especially designed to fit the structure
of the numerical traces of the method. This property allows to prove
in a very concise manner that the projection of the errors is
bounded in terms of the distance between the exact solution and its projection.
The study of the influence of the stabilization function
on the approximation is then reduced to the study of how they affect
the approximation properties of the projection in a single element.
Consequently, we prove that HDG methods have the same result as DG methods.
At the end of the thesis, we talk a little bit of shell problems.
Recommended Citation
Fan, Li, "Dg And Hdg Methods For Curved Structures" (2013). Wayne State University Dissertations. 761.
https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/761