Title
The antimicrobial, mechanical, physical and structural properties of chitosan-gallic acid films
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Chitosan films incorporated with various concentrations of gallic acid were prepared and investigated for antimicrobial, mechanical, physical and structural properties. Four bacterial strains that commonly contaminate food products were chosen as target bacteria to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the prepared gallic acid-chitosan films. The incorporation of gallic acid significantly increased the antimicrobial activities of the films against Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria innocua and Bacillus subtilis. Chitosan films incorporated with 1.5 g/100 g gallic acid showed the strongest antimicrobial activity. It was also found that tensile strength (TS) of chitosan film was significantly increased when incorporating 0.5 g/100 g gallic acid. Inclusion of 0.5 g/100 g gallic acid also significantly decreased water vapor permeability (WVP) and oxygen permeability (OP). Microstructure of the films was investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and it was found that gallic acid was dispersed homogenously into the chitosan matrix.
Disciplines
Microbiology | Molecular, Genetic, and Biochemical Nutrition
Recommended Citation
Sun, X., Wang, Z., Kadouh, H., & Zhou, K. The antimicrobial, mechanical, physical and structural properties of chitosan-gallic acid films. LWT - Food Science and Technology 57(1): 83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.037
Comments
NOTICE IN COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLISHER POLICY: This is the Author’s Accepted Manuscript version of a work that was subsequently published in LWT – Food Science and Technology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in LWT – Food Science and Technology 57(1): 83-89 (June 2014). doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.037