Abstract
The behavior of the Wald-z, Wald-c, Quesenberry-Hurst, Wald-m and Agresti-Min methods was investigated for matched proportions confidence intervals. It was concluded that given the widespread use of the repeated-measure design, pretest-posttest design, matched-pairs design, and cross-over design, the textbook Wald-z method should be abandoned in favor of the Agresti-Min alternative.
DOI
10.22237/jmasm/1257034440
Included in
Applied Statistics Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Statistical Theory Commons
