Abstract
Research shows good probability coverage using analytic confidence intervals (CIs) for Spearman’s rho with continuous data, but poorer coverage with ordinal data. A simulation study examining the latter case replicated prior results and revealed that coverage of bootstrap CIs was usually as good or better than coverage of analytic CIs.
DOI
10.22237/jmasm/1225512360
Included in
Applied Statistics Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Statistical Theory Commons
