Abstract
The dissemination of intervention and treatment outcomes as effect sizes bounded by conf idence intervals in order to think meta-analytically was promoted in a recent article in Educational Researcher. I raise concerns with unfettered reporting of effect sizes, point out the con in confidence interval, and caution against thinking meta-analytically. Instead, cataloging effect sizes is recommended for sample size estimation and power analysis to improve social and behavioral science research.
DOI
10.22237/jmasm/1051747860
Included in
Applied Statistics Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Statistical Theory Commons
