Abstract
In program monitoring, social policy researchers often use multiple case methods of analysis, comparing cases with low and high impact. In view of the low "observer" reliability of case analysis, a standard analytical approach is recommended. The article discusses three conceptual models of program implementation that provide valid standardization of program evaluation and adjustment.
Recommended Citation
van de Vall, Mark
(1989)
"A Comparative Case Method for "Local Molar" Program Evaluation and Adjustment,"
Clinical Sociology Review: Vol. 7:
Iss.
1, Article 9.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/csr/vol7/iss1/9
